Macon v. Family Dollar Stores of MO, LLC

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Family Dollar Stores of MO, LLCs Motion for Leave to Amend Notice of Removal (Doc. 13 ) is GRANTED, and Family Dollar Stores of MO, LLC shall file its Amended Removal Notice within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the Courts decision to grant Defendants Motion for Leave to Amend Notice of Removal, Plaintiff Darrell Macons Motion to Remand (Doc. 10 ) is DENIED, as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 08/09/2016. (KCB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

DARRELL MACON,
Plaintiff,
v.
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES
OF MO, LLC,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:16-cv-00689-NCC

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Darrell Macon’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 10)
and Defendant Family Dollar Stores of MO, LLC’s Motion for Leave to Amend Notice of
Removal (Doc. 13). The Motions are fully briefed and ready for disposition. The parties have
consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title
28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (Doc. 20). For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion will be
GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Motion will be DENIED, as moot.
Defendant timely removed this action to this Court on May 17, 2016, based on diversity
jurisdiction (Doc. 1). In its Notice, Defendant alleges that the amount in controversy exceeds
$75,000 and the parties are citizens of different states. Specifically, as relevant to the current
Motions, Defendant asserts that Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Missouri and Defendant is “a
Virginian limited liability corporation with its principal place of business in Virginia. As such,
Defendant is considered a citizen of Virginia for purposes of diversity” (Id. at 3). On June 7,
2016, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand, asserting that Defendant “defectively raised the issue
of citizenship because it is established law that a limited liability company is a citizen of every
state in which its members are citizens” (Doc. 10 at 2). Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks remand

because Defendant failed to properly allege the citizenship of every member of the Defendant
LLC within the 30-day removal deadline (Id.). On June 8, 2016, Defendant responded that this
technical error may be cured by amending Defendant’s Notice (Doc. 12) and, on that same day,
filed a Motion for Leave to Amend its Notice of Removal (Doc. 13). In its Motion for Leave to
Amend its Notice of Removal, Defendant indicates that its sole member is Family Dollar Stores,
Inc., which is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located in North
Carolina. In support of its assertion, Defendant provides the Court with the Affidavit of Marc
Metcalf, senior counsel with Family Dollar, Inc. (Doc. 13-1).
“Allegations of jurisdiction which are defective should be discovered and corrected in the
District Court.” Texaco-Cities Serv. Pipe Line Co. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 283 F.2d 144, 145
(8th Cir. 1960) (per curiam). One statutory avenue for such a correction is 28 U.S.C. § 1653,
under which “[d]efective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended, upon terms, in the trial or
appellate courts.” Id. Based on § 1653, the Eighth Circuit recently allowed amendment on appeal of
a removal notice that initially alleged only the residency of the plaintiff after evidence was offered to
show the plaintiff’s citizenship at the time of filing and removal. Reece v. Bank of New York Mellon,
760 F.3d 771, 776-78 (8th Cir. 2014).

The Court finds that Defendant’s technical error does not warrant remand. Defendant has
provided uncontested information that the sole member of Defendant LLC is Family Dollar
Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located in North
Carolina. Defendant also asserts that complete diversity existed both at the time of filing as well
as the time of removal. Furthermore, Plaintiff does not indicate he would be unfairly prejudiced
if Defendant was allowed to amend. Therefore, in the interests of justice, the Court will allow
Defendant to amend its Notice of Removal.
Accordingly,
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Family Dollar Stores of MO, LLC’s
Motion for Leave to Amend Notice of Removal (Doc. 13) is GRANTED, and Family Dollar
Stores of MO, LLC shall file its Amended Removal Notice within seven (7) days of the date of
this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the Court’s decision to grant Defendant’s
Motion for Leave to Amend Notice of Removal, Plaintiff Darrell Macon’s Motion to Remand
(Doc. 10) is DENIED, as moot.
Dated this 9th day of August, 2016.

/s/ Noelle C. Collins
NOELLE C. COLLINS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3