Robertson v. Alexander et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter is before me on plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. I have reviewed the case file and find no error in the dismissal of this action. The allegations in the complaint fail to rise to the level of a constitut ional violation, and therefore, are not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 13 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/20/17. (EAB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
WILLIE C. ROBERTSON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
DIRELL ALEXANDER, et al.,
Defendants,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:16-CV-693 CDP

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. I have reviewed the
case file and find no error in the dismissal of this action. The allegations in the complaint fail to
rise to the level of a constitutional violation, and therefore, are not actionable under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 13] is
DENIED.
Dated this 20th day of March, 2017.

CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE