Fulton v. United States of America et al
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Janice Fultons request for disbursement of interpleaded funds [ 70 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall pay from the interpleaded funds currently on deposit in t he registry of the Court the sum of One Thousand Nine Hundred Fifteen and 00/100 Dollars ($1915.00), made payable to Back & Neck Care Center of North County LLC and to be mailed to Back & Neck Care Center of North County LLC, 11638 W. Florissant Avenue, Florissant, Missouri 63033, thereby satisfying its claim for interpleaded funds [ 69 ]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall pay the balance of the interpleaded funds to plaintiff Janice Fulton, made payable to Janice Fulton a nd to be mailed to her at 1923 N. Church Street, Belleville, Illinois 62221. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Janice Fultons claims against defendant United States of America are dismissed with prejudice. This case, in its entirety, is now closed. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/18/17. (JAB)(cc: Finance Dept.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JANICE FULTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:16 CV 731 CDP
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
In this action, plaintiff Janice Fulton settled her claims against defendant
United States of America for $17,000. On July 11, 2017, attorney Spencer
Farris deposited into the registry of the Court $11,853.88, which was the amount
of settlement proceeds remaining after deduction of attorney’s fees and costs. In
accordance with my Order of June 20, attorney Farris provided notice of these
interpleaded funds to certain of plaintiff’s healthcare providers, informing them
that they had thirty days within which to assert a lien or claim to any of these
funds by filing a claim in interpleader in this action. The time for filing such
claims has passed.1
1
Farris sent notice to plaintiff’s healthcare providers on July 7 (ECF #68) and deposited the
funds into the Court’s registry on July 11. My June 20 Order instructed these healthcare
providers to file their claims with the Court no later than thirty days after receipt of Farris’s
notice. There is a presumption that correspondence is received three days after it is mailed.
One healthcare provider – Back & Neck Care Center of North County
LLC – filed a claim for interpleaded funds. (See ECF #69) Plaintiff does not
object to this provider’s claim for funds and asks that I order their disbursement,
with the remainder of the interpleaded funds to be paid to her. I will grant
plaintiff’s request.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Janice Fulton’s request for
disbursement of interpleaded funds [70] is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall pay from the
interpleaded funds currently on deposit in the registry of the Court the sum of
One Thousand Nine Hundred Fifteen and 00/100 Dollars ($1915.00), made
payable to Back & Neck Care Center of North County LLC and to be mailed to
Back & Neck Care Center of North County LLC, 11638 W. Florissant Avenue,
Florissant, Missouri 63033, thereby satisfying its claim for interpleaded funds
[69].
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall pay the
balance of the interpleaded funds to plaintiff Janice Fulton, made payable to
Janice Fulton and to be mailed to her at 1923 N. Church Street, Belleville,
Euell v. Potter, No. 4:06-CV-1154 CAS, 2007 WL 1704934, at *2 n.2 (E.D. Mo. June 12,
2007); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).
-2-
Illinois 62221.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Janice Fulton’s claims
against defendant United States of America are dismissed with prejudice.
This case, in its entirety, is now closed.
CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 18th day of August, 2017.
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?