White v. Russell et al

Filing 103

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for extension of time to pay the initial partial appellate filing fee [Doc. #99] and for extension of time to file his appellate brief [Doc. #100] are DENIED AS MOOT as this matter has been dismissed by the United States Court of Appeals. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/17/2019. (MRC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
ANTONIO RICARDO WHITE,
Plaintiff,
v.
TERRY RUSSELL, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:16-CV-886 CAS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the Court are plaintiff’s motions for extension of time to pay his initial partial
appellate filing fee, as well as his motion for extension of time to file his appellate brief.
The Court notes that the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed plaintiff’s appeal on
June 27, 2019. See White v. Russell, No. 19-1271 (8th 2019). Thus, plaintiff’s motions will be
denied as moot.1
Accordingly
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to pay the initial
partial appellate filing fee [Doc. #99] and for extension of time to file his appellate brief [Doc.
#100] are DENIED AS MOOT as this matter has been dismissed by the United States Court
of Appeals.

CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 17th day of July, 2019.

1

The Court notes that even if the matter was still pending in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, this Court would
not have jurisdiction to grant plaintiff additional time to file his appellate brief.