Powers et al v. City of Ferguson et al

Filing 71

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 70 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by Objector Curtis, Heinz, Garrett and O'Keefe. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to quash subpoena 70 is granted only to the following extent: non-party law firm Curtis, Heinz, Garrett & OKeefe, P.C. shall have 21 days to comply with the document production requested by plaintiffs. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/13/17. (ARL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL J. POWERS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF FERGUSON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:16 CV 1299 RWS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
For good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to quash subpoena [70] is
granted only to the following extent: non-party law firm Curtis, Heinz, Garrett &
O’Keefe, P.C. shall have 21 days to comply with the document production
requested by plaintiffs.

_______________________________
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 13th day of November, 2017.