Hunter v. Carson et al

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondents, because it appears that petitioner did not exhaust available state remedies before invoking federal habeas corpus jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant habeas corpus application for failure to exhaust available state remedies. Petitioner's failure to file a show cause response may result in the denial of the instant petition and the dismissal of this action, without prejudice.. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 08/22/2016. (KCB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
ALBERT COREY HUNTER,
Petitioner,
V.

JEFFERY CARSON, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:16-CV-1300-RLW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the petition of Albert Corey Hunter for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. l]. In addition, petitioner has filed a
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] , which will be granted. For the
following reasons, the Court will instruct petitioner to show cause why this action should
not be dismissed for failure to exhaust available state remedies.
Petitioner, a pre-trial detainee at the St. Louis City Justice Center, seeks a writ of
habeas corpus. Liberally construing the petition, petitioner is challenging the merits of
his ongoing state criminal proceeding, and he asks the Court to release him from his
illegal incarceration.
In the absence of exceptional circumstances, a state prisoner must exhaust
currently available and adequate state remedies before invoking federal habeas corpus
jurisdiction. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court ofKentucky, 410 U.S. 484 (1973).
State remedies are ordinarily not considered exhausted if an individual may effectively

present his claim to the state courts by any currently available and adequate procedure.
Not only will petitioner have the opportunity to raise constitutional challenges in the
context of his state criminal proceedings, and if necessary, subsequent appeal, but the
State of Missouri provides habeas corpus relief for prisoners in its custody. As such,
petitioner has available state procedures that he must exhaust before invoking federal
habeas jurisdiction.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time
as to respondents, because it appears that petitioner did not exhaust available state
remedies before invoking federal habeas corpus jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thirty (30)
days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant habeas
corpus application for failure to exhaust available state remedies. Petitioner' s failure to
file a show cause response may result in the denial of the instant petition and the
dismissal of this action, without prejudice.

Datedthis~p:/dayof~

, 2016.

~/.~

RONNIE L. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2