Austin v. USA

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this action and to file movant's motion to vacate as a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in United States v. Austin, No. 4:14-CR-133 RWS.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/30/16. (LGK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MONTRAIL AUSTIN, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:16-CV-1420 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before me on the motion of Montrail Austin to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Movant argues that his sentence should be reduced because of Amendment 794 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which clarified the meaning of “minor role” reductions in § 3B1.1. The requested relief is not cognizable in a § 2255 motion. The only way to seek relief based on a change to the Guidelines is in a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). As a result, I will order the Clerk to administratively terminate this action and to file the motion to vacate as a motion under § 3582(c)(2) in the underlying criminal action. The government must file its response in that case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this action and to file movant’s motion to vacate as a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in United States v. Austin, No. 4:14-CR-133 RWS. Dated this 30th day of September, 2016. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?