Lietar v. Colvin
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within seven days of the date of this Order, (1) Plaintiff shall file a statement by Plaintiff setting forth his position on the proposed dismissal without prejudice and (2) Defendant shall file a statement of her position with regard to the proposed dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 4/6/2017. (CBL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
SHAWN J.P. LIETAR,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case no. 4:16cv01506 PLC
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff moves for leave to voluntarily dismiss the complaint without prejudice [ECF No.
22]. Plaintiff’s counsel states a review of the record reveals it is not in Plaintiff’s best interest to
pursue his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act, and reports that
“Plaintiff is in agreement. (Exhibit A).” Exhibit A attached to the motion, however, does not
reflect Plaintiff’s position on the proposed dismissal but instead is an “Assignment of EAJA
Fees.” See ECF No. 22-1. In addition, the motion does not reveal what position, if any,
Defendant has on the proposed dismissal. Defendant filed her answer on November 23, 2016
[ECF No. 13]. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) permits a voluntary dismissal after an
answer is filed upon court order and “on terms that the court considers proper.” Under the
circumstances,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within seven days of the date of this Order, (1)
Plaintiff shall file a statement by Plaintiff setting forth his position on the proposed dismissal
without prejudice and (2) Defendant shall file a statement of her position with regard to the
proposed dismissal without prejudice.
PATRICIA L. COHEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated this 6th day of April, 2017.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?