Meier v. St. Louis, Missouri, City of et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extensions of time 43 is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/25/2017. (CAR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, et al.,
Case No. 4:16 CV 1549 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant Doc’s Towing requests an unspecified additional amount of time
beyond November 1, 2017, to file its motion for summary judgment. This motion
will be denied without prejudice because defendant has not indicated to the Court
how much additional time it requires to file its summary judgment motion. In
addition, the case is currently set for trial on March 12, 2018. Any extension of
time to file summary judgment motions will necessarily result in moving the trial
date, as the Court would have insufficient time to rule on any motions prior to the
pretrial materials being filed. If defendant chooses to again seek an extension of
time, such motion shall include proposed summary judgment deadlines and a
proposed new trial date that is acceptable to all parties. The motion shall also
indicate whether plaintiff and/or defendant City of St. Louis object to moving the
summary judgment and trial dates.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extensions of time  is
denied without prejudice.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 25th day of October, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?