Meier v. St. Louis, Missouri, City of et al

Filing 44

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extensions of time 43 is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/25/2017. (CAR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
MARY MEIER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:16 CV 1549 RWS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant Doc’s Towing requests an unspecified additional amount of time
beyond November 1, 2017, to file its motion for summary judgment. This motion
will be denied without prejudice because defendant has not indicated to the Court
how much additional time it requires to file its summary judgment motion. In
addition, the case is currently set for trial on March 12, 2018. Any extension of
time to file summary judgment motions will necessarily result in moving the trial
date, as the Court would have insufficient time to rule on any motions prior to the
pretrial materials being filed. If defendant chooses to again seek an extension of
time, such motion shall include proposed summary judgment deadlines and a
proposed new trial date that is acceptable to all parties. The motion shall also
indicate whether plaintiff and/or defendant City of St. Louis object to moving the
summary judgment and trial dates.

Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extensions of time [43] is
denied without prejudice.

RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 25th day of October, 2017.

2