Thompson v. St. Louis County Circuit Court

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 5 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus 4 , 1 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/29/16. (CAR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SARAI-GABAR THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Respondent, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:16-CV-1738 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before me on petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petition is denied. Petitioner is a pretrial detainee. On August 10, 2016, petitioner was charged with felony interference with custody. Missouri v. Thompson, No. 16-SL-CR05369-01 (St. Louis County). Petitioner has been referred to the Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center for a competency evaluation. In her petition, petitioner says she is a “flesh and blood living woman” and a non-citizen of the United States. She believes she is a “corporate citizen, not subject to the jurisdiction of the corporation[, i.e., state court,] or any of its representatives. Petitioner’s argument has no basis in law or fact. E.g., United States v. Hart, 701 F.2d 749, 750 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam). As a result, the petition is denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 5] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Dated this 29th day of November, 2016. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?