Bracken v. State of Missouri et al
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Prisoner Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Courtprovidedform within (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in formapauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his prison account sta tement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed, the dismissal will not constitute a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Response to Court due by 12/22/2016. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/22/16. cc: Forms mailed.(CLA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
GARVESTER BRACKEN,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF MISSOURI, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 4:16-CV-01802-NCC
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's pro se complaint. The complaint is defective
because it has not been drafted on a Court-provided form, see Local Rule 2.06(A), and because
plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along
with a prison account statement, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Additionally, plaintiff will be required
to amend his complaint in order to state a claim for relief against defendants.
Background
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He is currently incarcerated at
South Central Correctional Center (“SCCC”) in Licking, Missouri. He has filed a complaint
against defendants the State of Missouri; Jennifer Joyce (Prosecutor); Rachel Scharzlose (Asst.
Prosecutor); and Bobby Bailey (Former Asst. Prosecutor). Plaintiff asserts that each of these
defendants violated his rights by initiating and commencing a felony prosecution against him in
violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Discussion
The Court is required to conduct a pre-service review of an action filed by a prisoner
seeking to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. ' 1915. If any part of the complaint is
frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the Court is
required to dismiss the frivolous portions of the lawsuit prior to ordering service of process on the
complaint. 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e).
As noted above, plaintiff, a prisoner, has failed to submit a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis or an accompanying prison account statement, required by 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a).
Accordingly, the Court cannot grant plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis at this time.
Additionally, the way plaintiff’s complaint is currently drafted fails to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. The State of Missouri is absolutely immune from liability under 42
U.S.C. § 1983. See Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 63 (1989). And where
“[a] prosecutor is acting as advocate for the state in a criminal prosecution, [] the prosecutor is
entitled to absolute immunity.” Brodnicki v. City of Omaha, 75 F.3d 1261, 1266 (8th Cir. 1996).
Thus, as plaintiff’s complaint is currently pled, it is subject to dismissal.
However, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court will allow plaintiff to file an
amended complaint on a Court form. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this Order to
file an amended complaint in accordance with the specific instructions set forth herein.
All claims in an action must be included in one, centralized complaint form. Plaintiff is
warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and all
previously-filed pleadings, and so he must include each and every one of the claims he wishes
to pursue in the amended complaint. See, e.g., In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery
Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Any claims from the original complaint,
supplements, and/or pleadings that are not included in the amended complaint will be
deemed abandoned and will not be considered. Id. If plaintiff wishes to sue defendants in
-2-
their individual capacities, plaintiff must specifically say so in the amended complaint. If
plaintiff fails to sue defendants in their individual capacities, this action may be subject to
dismissal. All of plaintiff’s claims should be clearly set forth in the “Statement of Claim.” If
plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint on a Court form within thirty days in accordance with
the Court’s instructions, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further
notice.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's
form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's
Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Prisoner Cases.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Courtprovided form within (30) days of the date of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a
motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six month
period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint.
-3-
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the court will
dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed, the dismissal will not constitute a
"strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Dated this 22nd day of November, 2016.
____\s\ Jean C. Hamilton_______________
JEAN C. HAMILTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?