Armstrong v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Waive Alternative Dispute Resolution Compliance (ECF No. 32 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than November 6, 2017, Plaintiff shall file an appropriate motion for extension of the ADR deadline, with proposed dates for filing the designation of neutral, completing ADR, and filing the neutral's ADR compliance report. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/30/2017. (KCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
SABRINA L. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE
d/b/a US BANK, N.A.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:17CV106 RLW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Waive Alternative Dispute
Resolution Compliance (ECF No. 32). Plaintiffs counsel states that Plaintiff has refused
mediation. However, the Court notes that Plaintiff is under Court Order to participate in
Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR"), and she may not refuse to abide by such Order.
(ECF No. 31) Under the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri, Plaintiff is required to attend the ADR conference and participate in
good faith. E.D. Mo. L.R. 6.02(B)(l). Therefore, the Court will deny Plaintiffs motion.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Waive Alternative Dispute
Resolution Compliance (ECF No. 32) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than November 6, 2017, Plaintiff
shall file an appropriate motion for extension of the ADR deadline, with proposed dates
for filing the designation of neutral, completing ADR, and filing the neutral's ADR
compliance report. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including
dismissal of the Complaint.
Dated this 30th day of October, 2017.
RONNIE L. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?