Wallace v. Serco Inc.

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Court Order (ECF No. 19 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on August 24, 2017. (BRP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION NANCY L. WALLA CE, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) v. SERCO, INC., No.4:17-CV-861RLW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant Serco, Inc. ("Serco") moves for this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint with prejudice for failure to comply with this Court' s Orders to provide initial disclosures and responses to Serco' s First Interrogatories and First Requests for Production of Documents without objections. This Court had previously granted Defendant' s Motion to Compel (ECF Nos. 17, 18) and required that Plaintiff serve her initial disclosures and responses to discovery no later than August 7, 201 7. Plaintiff failed to provide initial disclosures or respond to Serco' s discovery requests by August 7, 2017. On August 11 , 2017, Serco filed its Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Court Order (ECF No. 19). On August 14, 2017, this Court issued an Order for Plaintiff to provide her initial disclosures and respond to Serco' s discovery requests no later than August 21, 2017. (ECF No. 20). The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court' s August 14, 2017 Order could result in dismissal of her Complaint. Plaintiff, however, failed to provide any disclosures or discovery materials to Serco by August 21 , 2017. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant' s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Court Order (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Dated this 24th day of August, 2017. ~d/t!Jh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?