Wilson v. Cauldwell
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. 2 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 4/20/17. (CLA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
REGINALD D. WILSON,
No. 4:17-CV-1347 JCH
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff=s motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Plaintiff, a prisoner, has filed at least three previous cases that were dismissed as
frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim.1
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),
therefore, the Court may not grant the motion unless plaintiff “is under imminent danger
of serious physical injury.”
After carefully reviewing the complaint, the Court finds no allegations that show
plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. As a result, the Court will deny
the motion and dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
See Wilson v. City of St. Louis, No. 4:07-CV-854 (E.D. Mo.); Wilson v. Wilson, No. 4:09-CV160-MLM (E.D. Mo.); Wilson v. Hallazzgo, No. 4:09-CV-1346-TCM (E.D. Mo.); Wilson v.
State of Mo., No. 4:11-CV-1014-AGF (E.D. Mo.).
An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately.
Dated this 20th
day of April, 2017.
\s\ Jean C. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?