Wilson v. Corizon Medical, et al

Filing 5

OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/20/17. (KJS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION REGINALD D. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON MEDICAL, Defendant, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:17CV1348 JMB OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff=s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a prisoner, has filed at least three previous cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim.1 Plaintiff says he has several medical conditions but that he is refusing treatment. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), therefore, the Court may not grant the motion unless plaintiff “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” After carefully reviewing the complaint, the Court finds no allegations that show plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. As a result, the Court will deny the motion and dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. See Wilson v. City of St. Louis, No. 4:07-CV-854 (E.D. Mo.); Wilson v. Wilson, No. 4:09-CV160-MLM (E.D. Mo.); Wilson v. Hallazzgo, No. 4:09-CV-1346-TCM (E.D. Mo.); Wilson v. State of Mo., No. 4:11-CV-1014-AGF (E.D. Mo.). 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Dated this 20th day of April, 2017 ___________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?