Parks v. Black et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 7 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 07/07/2017. (KCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KYLE MAURICE PARKS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW BLACK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:17CV1453 RLW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs letter (ECF No. 7), which the Court construes as a motion to amend his complaint by interlineation. The Court does not accept amendments by interlineation. 1 If plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he must include with his motion to amend a proposed complaint that includes each and every claim he wishes to bring against every defendant in this action. Plaintiff is warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint, and claims that are not realleged are deemed abandoned. E.g. , 1 Popoalii v. Correctional Medical Services, 512 F.3d 488, 497 (8th Cir. 2008) (finding that it is appropriate to deny leave to amend a complaint when a proposed amendment was not submitted with the motion). In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 7) is DENIED without prejudice. Dated this 7th day of June, 2017. RONNIE L. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?