Williams v. LLoynde et al

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his complaint [Doc. # 30 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall not file any additional motions in this closed case. The Clerk shall return any motions filed by plaintiff not related to an appeal in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 02/01/2021. (ANP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN KUNLAY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN LLOYNDE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:17-CV-1481 NCC MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the August 1, 2017, dismissal of this action. After reviewing the grounds raised by plaintiff, the Court will decline to alter or amend the judgment of this Court. The Court concludes that plaintiff’s motion fails to point to any manifest errors of law or fact, or any newly discovered evidence. Instead, the motion can be said to merely revisit old arguments and it raises new grounds for relief that were not raised in his complaint. Plaintiff is therefore not entitled to reconsideration of the dismissal of his complaint, and his motion will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his complaint [Doc. #30] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall not file any additional motions in this closed case. The Clerk shall return any motions filed by plaintiff not related to an appeal in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 1st day of February, 2021. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton JEAN C. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?