Davis v. Social Security Administration

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 11, 2017. (BRP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CORYESHA DAVIS , Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4: 17CV1634 RL W MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Memorandum in response to the Court's Order to Show Cause dated August 11, 2017 (ECF No. 11), which the Court construes as a motion to amend her complaint by interlineation. The Court does not accept amendments by interlineation. 1 If plaintiff wishes to amend her complaint, she must file a motion to amend and include with her motion a proposed complaint that includes each and every claim she wishes to bring against Defendant in this action. Help with filing a pro se complaint is available at 1 Popoalii v. Correctional Medical Services, 512 F .3d 488, 497 (8th Cir. 2008) (finding that it is appropriate to deny leave to amend a complaint when a proposed amendment was not submitted with the motion). http://www.moed.uscourts.gov/pro-se. Plaintiff is warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint, and claims that are not realleged are deemed abandoned. E.g., In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 11) is DENIED without prejudice. Dated this 11th day of September, 2017. ~ ~!EL.WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?