Wright v. Lisenbee et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/26/17. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
JOSHUA MICHAEL WRIGHT,
RICHARD LISENBEE, et al.,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On August 4, 2017, mail that this Court sent
to plaintiff was returned without a forwarding address, and plaintiff has not notified the Court of
any change in his address. The Local Rules of this Court require a pro se party to promptly
notify the Clerk of any change in his address or telephone number. See E.D. Mo. L.R. 2.06(B).
“If any mail to a pro se plaintiff or petitioner is returned to the Court without a forwarding
address and the pro se plaintiff does not notify the Court of the change of address within thirty
(30) days, the Court may, without further notice, dismiss the action without prejudice.” Id.
In this case, more than thirty days have passed since the mail was returned, and plaintiff
has not notified the Court of a change of address. The Court will therefore dismiss this action,
without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 2.06(B).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A
separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in
Dated this 26th day of September, 2017.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?