Watson v. Boyd et al

Filing 110

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 74 ) and Plaintiff's 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103 ) are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 4/9/2019. (AFC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

FRED WATSON,

)
)

Plaintiff,

)

No. 4:17-CV-2187 RLW

)
)
)
)
)
)

v.

EDDIE BOYD, et al.,
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the
Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling
Order ("Motion to Stay"; ECF No. 74) and Plaintiffs 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103). Plaintiffs Motions sought relief from the scheduling order
until the Court ruled on various discovery motions pending before the Court. On March 28,
2019, the Court extended Plaintiffs deadline for responding to Defendants' Motion for
Summary Judgment until May 17, 2019. (ECF No. 108). On April 5, 2019, this Court ruled on
the pending discovery motions.

Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiffs Motion to Stay and

Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment, without prejudice, because the Court has ruled
on the pending discovery motions and granted Plaintiff additional time to respond Defendants'
Motion for Summary Judgment. Any further requests for relief or additional time should be filed
as new motions.
According! y,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the

Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling

Order (ECF No. 74) and Plaintiffs 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 103) are DENIED without prejudice.
Dated this 9th day of April, 2019.

~rl·~
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-