Seals-Ali v. Perkins

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed informa pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED withoutprejudice. 2 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 8/7/17. (CLA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SOLOMON SEALS-ALI, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK PERKINS, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:17-CV-2205 JCH MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff=s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a prisoner, has filed at least three previous cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim.1 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), therefore, the Court may not grant the motion unless plaintiff “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” After carefully reviewing the complaint, the Court finds no allegations that show plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. As a result, the Court will deny the motion and dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. Accordingly, 1 Seales v. Groose, No. 95-CV-4187-SOW (W.D. Mo.) ; Seales v. Moorish Science Temple, Case No. 95-CV-4246-SOW (W.D. Mo.); Seales v. Groose, No. 96-4053 (W.D.Mo.); Seales v. Groose, No. 96- 4232 (W.D.Mo.); Seals v. Kemna, 98-CV-6153- HFS (W.D. Mo.); Seales v. Kemna, Case No. 98-6157-HFS (W.D. Mo.). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Dated this 7th day of August, 2017. \s\ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?