Kosin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 33

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion to Compel 32 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff Charm Kosin shall answer all interrogatories fully, under oath; produce all documents requested; and serve upon defendant a certification that she has fully complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 in her production. All objections to the propounded interrogatories and re quests for production are waived. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay defendant its reasonable attorney's fees in preparing and filing its motion to compel. Failure to comply with this Order will, if requested, result in the entry of sanctions which could include, if requested and among other things, dismissal of the case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/2/18. (EAB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CHARM KOSIN, as the personal representative of the Estate of Marvin H. Kosin, Jr., deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:17 CV 2435 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant served its written discovery on plaintiff in November 2017. Plaintiff never responded by way of answer or objection despite defendant’s repeated requests in January, February, and early March 2018. Plaintiff has now failed to respond to defendant’s motion to compel, and the time to do so has passed. I will grant the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion to Compel [32] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff Charm Kosin shall answer all interrogatories fully, under oath; produce all documents requested; and serve upon defendant a certification that she has fully complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 in her production. All objections to the propounded interrogatories and requests for production are waived. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay defendant its reasonable attorney’s fees in preparing and filing its motion to compel. Failure to comply with this Order will, if requested, result in the entry of sanctions which could include, if requested and among other things, dismissal of the case with prejudice. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 2nd day of April, 2018. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?