Kosin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion to Compel 32 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff Charm Kosin shall answer all interrogatories fully, under oath; produce all documents requested; and serve upon defendant a certification that she has fully complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 in her production. All objections to the propounded interrogatories and re quests for production are waived. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay defendant its reasonable attorney's fees in preparing and filing its motion to compel. Failure to comply with this Order will, if requested, result in the entry of sanctions which could include, if requested and among other things, dismissal of the case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/2/18. (EAB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
CHARM KOSIN, as the personal
representative of the Estate of
Marvin H. Kosin, Jr., deceased,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:17 CV 2435 CDP
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant served its written discovery on plaintiff in November 2017.
Plaintiff never responded by way of answer or objection despite defendant’s
repeated requests in January, February, and early March 2018. Plaintiff has now
failed to respond to defendant’s motion to compel, and the time to do so has
passed. I will grant the motion.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Union Pacific Railroad
Company’s Motion to Compel [32] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this
Order, plaintiff Charm Kosin shall answer all interrogatories fully, under oath;
produce all documents requested; and serve upon defendant a certification that she
has fully complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 in her production. All objections to the
propounded interrogatories and requests for production are waived.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay defendant its
reasonable attorney’s fees in preparing and filing its motion to compel.
Failure to comply with this Order will, if requested, result in the entry
of sanctions which could include, if requested and among other things,
dismissal of the case with prejudice.
CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 2nd day of April, 2018.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?