Zeigenbein v. Howell et al

Filing 66

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 37-3.04(A). ECF No. 64 . Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/9/19. (KXS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
LOUIS NEAL ZEIGENBEIN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
STEVE HOWELL, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. No. 4:17-CV-02749-AGF

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 64) to compel Defendants’
responses to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents.
The motion will be denied without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 37-3.04(A), which states
that the Court will not consider any motion related to discovery and disclosure unless the motion
contains a statement that movant’s counsel has conferred in person or by telephone with the
opposing counsel in good faith or has made reasonable efforts to do so, but that after sincere
efforts to resolve their dispute, counsel are unable to reach an accord. Pursuant to Local Rule
3.04(A), the statement must recite the date, time, and manner of such in-person or telephone
conference, and the names of the individuals participating therein, or must state with specificity
the efforts made to confer with opposing counsel.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to compel is DENIED without
prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 37-3.04(A). ECF No. 64.

_______________________________
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 9th day of August, 2019.