Hinkle v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police et al

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken ingood faith.. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 03/09/2018. (AAS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DEMARCO G. HINKLE, Plaintiff, v. ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN POLICE and CARLTON MCGRAW, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:18-cv-295-JCH MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff, a prisoner, filed the instant complaint in this Court on February 20, 2018 against the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department and Carlton McGraw. Plaintiff alleges that, on February 15, 2015, he was injured in a car accident caused by the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department. He seeks monetary damages. On February 7, 2018, plaintiff filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, alleging identical claims against the same two defendants and seeking monetary damages. On February 20, 2018, that case was transferred here on the basis of venue. See Hinkle v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police and Carlton McGraw, Case No. 4:18-cv-299 (E.D. Mo. 2018) (hereafter “Hinkle I”). The instant complaint raises identical claims against the same parties plaintiff is suing in Hinkle I . This action will therefore be dismissed as duplicative of that pending action. See Aziz v. Burrows, 976 F.2d 1158, 1158-59 (8th Cir. 1992) (affirming 28 U.S.C. § 1915 dismissal on ground that “district courts may dismiss a duplicative complaint raising issues directly related to issues in another pending action brought by the same party”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Dated this ____9th____ day of March, 2018. \s\ Jean C. Hamilton JEAN C. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?