Watson v. Driskill et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to obtain electronically stored information (Docket No. 39) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on January 22, 2020. (MCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION PIERRE WATSON, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY DRISKILL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:18-CV-764-NAB MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Pierre Watson’s motion to obtain electronically stored information. (Docket No. 39). The motion seeks video surveillance that plaintiff believes may be destroyed once defendants are served. The motion will be denied as premature as the Court has not yet authorized discovery in this case and has not yet issued a case management order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to obtain electronically stored information (Docket No. 39) is DENIED. NANNETTE A. BAKER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated this 22nd day of January, 2020.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?