Watson v. Driskill et al
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to obtain electronically stored information (Docket No. 39) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on January 22, 2020. (MCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
PIERRE WATSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ZACHARY DRISKILL, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:18-CV-764-NAB
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Pierre Watson’s motion to obtain
electronically stored information. (Docket No. 39). The motion seeks video surveillance that
plaintiff believes may be destroyed once defendants are served. The motion will be denied as
premature as the Court has not yet authorized discovery in this case and has not yet issued a case
management order.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to obtain electronically stored
information (Docket No. 39) is DENIED.
NANNETTE A. BAKER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated this 22nd day of January, 2020.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?