Barnett v. St. Louis City Justice Center
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that non-party City of St. Louis's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Waiver of Service Request (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of St. Louis shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this order in which to file a response to the waiver of service request. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on November 15, 2018. (MCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHNATHAN BARNETT
Plaintiff,
v.
ST. LOUIS CITY JUSTICE CENTER, et al.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:18-cv-00841-CDP
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the second motion of non-party City of St. Louis
for an extension of time to respond to the waiver of service request sent by the Court on August
27, 2018, for defendant Breana Ems. The City of St. Louis requests an additional extension of
time up to November 27, 2018, in order for the Law Department to communicate with defendant
Ems and receive her permission to waive service. The City of State Louis notes that
communication with defendant Ems has been delayed because she works second shift, and
because counsel has been in a jury trial. Good cause being show, the second motion to extend
time to respond to the waiver of service request will be granted, and the City of St. Louis will be
given fourteen days from the date of this order in which to respond.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that non-party City of St. Louis’s Second Motion for
Extension of Time to Respond to Waiver of Service Request (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of St. Louis shall have fourteen (14) days
from the date of this order in which to file a response to the waiver of service request.
Dated this 15th day of November, 2018
CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?