Pearson v. St. Louis City Police Department 4th District et al

Filing 82

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 72 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Bradley Pearson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's "motion" [#72] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/8/19. (CSG)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JEREMY BRADLEY PEARSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH MORRELL,
Defendant.

Case No. 4:18cv843 SNLJ

MEMORANDUM and ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s request for instructions regarding
how to properly correct a deposition [#72]. (The memorandum has been styled as a
“Motion to Correct Deposition” on the docket sheet.) Plaintiff states he received a letter
from the Court Reporter who transcribed his deposition. She said he could order a copy
of the deposition $182.30 or he can make arrangements to read and sign the deposition
within 30 days. Plaintiff states in his memorandum to the Court that he has some
corrections to share and that he wants to know how to correct “a few discrepancies.”
It appears that, among other things, plaintiff objects to the inclusion of periods at
the end of his statements before being interrupted by defense counsel. Plaintiff says that
the inclusion of the period makes it seem as though he was finished speaking when in fact
he was interrupted.

1

Plaintiff’s question is more appropriately directed to the Court Reporter, whom he
is free to contact in writing with a copy to defense counsel.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “motion” [#72] is DENIED.

Dated this 8th day of October, 2019.
_____________________________________
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2