Killian v. Jefferson County Jail et al

Filing 36

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 35) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall request that the agency having custody of Plaintiff begin making payments in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) until the $505 appellate fee is paid in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 11/21/2022. (KRZ)

Download PDF
Case: 4:21-cv-01294-JMB Doc. #: 36 Filed: 11/21/22 Page: 1 of 1 PageID #: 142 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JESSE NOEAL KILLIAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. JERRY S. ADAMS, Defendant. Case No. 4:21 CV 1294 JMB MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Jesse Noal Killian’s Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal (Doc. 35). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3) provides that “[a] party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action . . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization, unless” the court certifies that the appeal “is not taken in good faith.” See also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis in this Court and therefore may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal unless the appeal is not taken in good faith. The undersigned cannot certify that the appeal is not taken in good faith. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 35) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall request that the agency having custody of Plaintiff begin making payments in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) until the $505 appellate fee is paid in full. JOHN M. BODENHAUSEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated this 21st day of November, 2022 Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?