Easley v. Canam Steel Corporation et al
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, Doc. 16 , is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Missouri. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants 9; Joint Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 10 , and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay, Doc. 18 , are DENIED as moot in light of the Court's lack of jurisdiction. A separate Order of Remand will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 01/27/2025. (KRZ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JODI EASLEY,
v.
Plaintiff,
CANAM STEEL CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:24-cv-01111-SEP
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Jodi Easley’s Motion to Remand. Doc. [16]. After careful
review of the petition, Doc. [1-1], the notice of removal, Doc. [1], and the parties’ briefing, Docs.
[16], [17], [22], [23], the Court concludes that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) requires remand of this action
for the reasons set forth in several other cases asserting the same legal claims against the same
Defendants based on similar factual allegations. See Medders-Carpenter v. Canam Steel Corp.,
4:24-cv-0928-SRC, 2024 WL 4973400 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2024); Kline v. Canam Steel Corp.,
4:24-cv01420-SRC, 2024 WL 4973399 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2024); see also Borgmann v. Canam
Steel Corp., 4:24-cv-01423-CDP, Doc. [29] (E.D. Mo. Dec. 17, 2024).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Doc. [16], is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of
Franklin County, Missouri.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss, Doc. [10], and
Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay, Doc. [18], are DENIED as moot in light of the Court’s lack of
jurisdiction.
A separate Order of Remand will accompany this Memorandum and Order.
Dated this 27th day of January, 2025.
SARAH E. PITLYK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?