Ramirez v. Canam Steel Corporation et al

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, Doc. 16 , is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Missouri. The Clerk of Court shall mail a certifie d copy of this Memorandum and Order to the clerk of the state court. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 10 , Plaintiff's Motion to Stay, Doc. 18 , and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Submit Notice of Supplemental Authority, Doc. 27 , are DENIED as moot. A separate Order of Remand will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 01/27/2025. (KRZ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARISSA RAMIREZ, v. Plaintiff, CANAM STEEL CORP., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:24-cv-01115-SEP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Marissa Ramirez’s Motion to Remand. Doc. [16]. After careful review of the petition, Doc. [1-1], the notice of removal, Doc. [1], and the parties’ briefing, Docs. [16], [17], [22], [23], the Court concludes that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) requires remand of this action for the reasons set forth in several other cases asserting the same legal claims against the same Defendants based on similar factual allegations. See Medders-Carpenter v. Canam Steel Corp., 4:24-cv-00928-SRC, 2024 WL 4973400 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2024); Kline v. Canam Steel Corp., 4:24-cv-01420-SRC, 2024 WL 4973399 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2024); Borgmann v. Canam Steel Corp., 4:24-cv-01423-CDP, Doc. [29] (E.D. Mo. Dec. 17, 2024). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Doc. [16], is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Missouri. The Clerk of Court shall mail a certified copy of this Memorandum and Order to the clerk of the state court. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss, Doc. [10], Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay, Doc. [18], and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Submit Notice of Supplemental Authority, Doc. [27], are DENIED as moot. A separate Order of Remand will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Dated this 27th day of January, 2025. SARAH E. PITLYK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?