Taylor v. Comes et al
ORDER granting 76 motion for summary judgment; granting 99 motion for summary judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 109 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 9/23/09. (James, Carrie)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
SAMUEL LEWIS TAYLOR, Reg. No. 166914, Plaintiff, v. ROBYN COMBS, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ORDER On August 20, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge William A. Knox recommended that the motions of Missouri Department of Corrections defendants Dave Dormire, Lisa Jones, Robyn Combs, Walter Koon, Gregory Patrick , and Curtis Nelson be granted and plaintiff's claims against these defendants be dismissed. The parties were advised they could file written exceptions to the recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including the exceptions filed by plaintiff on September 11, 2009. The issues raised in plaintiff's exceptions were adequately addressed in the report and recommendation. Specifically, as to plaintiff's excessive force claims, he cannot create a question of fact or issue of credibility by contradicting his own previous testimony given under oath at his deposition. City of St. Joseph, Missouri v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, 439 F.3d 468, 475-76 (8th Cir. 2006). The court is persuaded that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and should be adopted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of August 20, 2009, is adopted.  It is further
ORDERED that the motions of Missouri Department of Corrections defendants Dave Dormire, Lisa Jones, Robyn Combs, Walter Koon, Gregory Patrick , and Curtis Nelson are granted and plaintiff's claims against these defendants are dismissed. [76, 99]
/ s/ SCOTT O. WRIGHT Senior United States District Judge Dated: September 23, 2009 Kansas City, Missouri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?