Johnson v. Jones et al

Filing 17

ORDER denying 6 Motion for preliminary injunction; denying 9 motion for preliminary injunction; adopting Report and Recommendations re 14 Report and Recommendations, dismissing plaintiff's claims regarding a false conduct violation. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 3-23-2009. (Morse, Judy)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION RAYFIELD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MARTHA JONES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER No. 08-4259-CV-C-SOW On February 25, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge William A. Knox recommended that plaintiff's claims regarding a false conduct violation be dismissed, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Judge Knox further recommended that plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. The parties were advised they could file written exceptions to the recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). No exceptions have been filed. A review of the record convinces the court that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and should be adopted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of February 25, 2009, is adopted. [14] It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's claims regarding a false conduct violation are dismissed, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief are denied. [6, 9] /s/Scott O. Wright SCOTT O. WRIGHT Senior United States District Judge Dated: March 23, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?