Rollins v. Lombardi et al
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION dated June 17, 2009. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's claims are dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 10/6/2009. (Sandridge, Susan)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
RAY A. ROLLINS, Register No. 520743, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE LOMBARDI, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 09-4084-CV-C-SOW
ORDER On June 17, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge William A. Knox recommended dismissing plaintiff's claims. The parties were advised they could file written exceptions to the recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including the Supplemental Complaint filed by plaintiff on June 22, 2009, and his exceptions filed on July 2, 2009. The issues raised in plaintiff's filings were adequately addressed in the Report and Recommendation. The court is persuaded that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and should be adopted. Inmates who file an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit are required to pay the full $455.00 appellate filing fee, regardless of the outcome of the appeal. Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 484 (8th Cir. 1997). The filing of a notice of appeal is considered a consent by the inmate to allow prison officials to deduct an initial partial appellate filing fee and later installments from the prisoner's account.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that  the Report and Recommendation of June 17, 2009, is adopted. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's claims are dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.
/s/ Scott O. Wright SCOTT O. WRIGHT Senior United States District Judge DATED: October 6, 2009 Kansas City, Missouri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?