Moon v. Missouri Division of Employment Security et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 6 finding as moot 7 motion for reconsideration; denying 2 moiton to proceed IFP. Signed by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey on 10/5/09. (Price, Jackie)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION DARNELL WESLY MOON, Register No. 34077-044, Plaintiff, v. MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 09-4140-CV-C-NKL ORDER On August 20, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge William A. Knox recommended dismissing plaintiff's claims. The parties were advised they could file written exceptions to the recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). No exceptions have been filed. A review of the record convinces the court that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and should be adopted. Inmates who file an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit are required to pay the full $455.00 appellate filing fee, regardless of the outcome of the appeal. Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 484 (8th Cir. 1997). The filing of a notice of appeal is considered a consent by the inmate to allow prison officials to deduct an initial partial appellate filing fee and later installments from the prisoner's account. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of August 20, 2009, is adopted. [6] It is further ORDERED that plaintiff is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his claims are dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of assessment of an initial filing fee is denied as moot. [7] / s/ NANETTE K. LAUGHREY United States District Judge Dated: October 5, 2009 Jefferson City, Missouri 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?