Johnny v. Bornowski et al

Filing 75

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 plaintiff's motion for Leave to Depose Defendants' Expert Witnesses. Signed on 8/2/11 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION OSCAR L. JOHNNY, JR., Plaintiff, vs. LARRY BORNOWSKI and STAMPEDE CARRIERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 10-04008-CV-W-FJG ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Oscar Johnny, Jr.’s Unopposed Motion For Leave to Depose Defendants’ Experts by September 8, 2011 (Doc. No. 55). Plaintiff seeks to depose all six of Defendants’ designated expert witnesses. Under Rule 26(a)(2)(B), an expert’s written report must contain considerable explanation of the expert’s opinion and the basis and reasons therefor. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. As stated in Paragraph 7(a)(2) of the Scheduling Order, one of the purposes of the expert affidavit is to set forth the substance of a direct examination. If properly done, the expert affidavit should eliminate the need for deposing some experts. After careful review of Defendants’ expert witness reports, the Court shall allow the deposition of witness Bruno Schmidt, Ph.D. The Court finds additional discovery regarding the basis for this expert’s opinion would be helpful to support conclusions set forth in his affidavit. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Depose Defendants’ Expert Witnesses is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff SHALL conduct this deposition by AUGUST 24, 2011, and SHALL follow the Third Amended Scheduling Order in all other respects. Parties shall file a motion to request any additional depositions. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR. Fernando J. GAITAN, Jr. Chief United States District Judge Dated:_August 2, 2011__________ Kansas City, Missouri

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?