Janson et al v. LegalZoom.com, Inc.
Filing
131
Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey: TELEPHONE CONFERENCE held on 7/8/2011. Teleconference held regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Discovery and Compel Production [Doc. 123]. The Court discussed the issue of the parties voluntarily agreeing to submit this case directly to the Supreme Court or to the State court and work its way up. The Court gave the parties until July 13, 2011, to consider the issue and to send a joint email to Renea Kanies, Courtroom Deputy, regarding whether or not there is an agreement on the issue. The Court took the Motion to Reopen Discovery and Compel Production [Doc. 123] under advisement until after July 13, 2011. (Kanies, Renea)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CENTRAL DIVISION
TODD JANSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 10-04018-CV-C-NKL
July 8, 2011
MINUTE SHEET
HONORABLE Nanette K. Laughrey presiding at Jefferson City, Missouri.
====================================================================
Nature of Proceeding: Teleconference
Time: 9:00 a.m. - 9:08 a.m.
Plaintiff by: Matt Clement, Tim Van Ronzelen, and David Butsch
Defendant by: Robert Thompson and James Wicks
Comments:
Teleconference held regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Discovery and Compel Production
[Doc. 123]. The Court discussed the issue of the parties voluntarily agreeing to submit this case
directly to the Supreme Court or to the State court and work its way up. The Court gave the
parties until July 13, 2011, to consider the issue and to send a joint email to Renea Kanies,
Courtroom Deputy, regarding whether or not there is an agreement on the issue.
The Court took the Motion to Reopen Discovery and Compel Production [Doc. 123] under
advisement until after July 13, 2011.
Court Reporter: None
By: Renea Kanies, Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?