Kent v. Charter Communications LLC et al

Filing 64

ORDER denying 63 defendants' Motion to vacate. Signed on 10/16/14 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION KENNETH M. KENT, Plaintiff, vs. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 13-4156-CV-C-FJG ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Vacate the Court’s December 26, 2013 and August 21, 2014 Orders finding Plaintiff’s Claim is Sufficiently Plead and Subject to a Ten-Year Statute of Limitations (Doc. No. 63). This case was remanded to state court on August 21, 2014. See Doc. No. 61. After the case had been remanded, defendants filed the present motion, requesting the Court vacate its previous orders finding that a 10-year statute of limitations could apply under the facts alleged by plaintiff, arguing that the Court should have considered its subject matter jurisdiction before making merits determinations in the underlying suit. The Court will deny defendants’ request. One reason why the Court considered which statute of limitations applied is because defendants had alleged fraudulent joinder. If the statute of limitations precluded a lawsuit against the in-state defendants, those defendants would have been found to have been fraudulently joined and the case would therefore have been removable. Thus, it was necessary for the Court to consider the statute of limitations in making its subject matter jurisdiction determination. Furthermore, the Court’s denial of a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations is not a final decision on the merits. As the Court made perfectly clear in its Orders, the statute of limitations issues raised by defendants may be more appropriate for summary judgment. See Orders, Doc. Nos. 33 at p. 6, 61 at p. 9. Defendants’ motion to vacate (Doc. No. 63) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. United States District Judge Dated: October 16, 2014 Kansas City, Missouri 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?