The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee v. Nichols et al
Filing
30
ORDER entered by Nanette Laughrey. The Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is deemed withdrawn and the Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 3] is GRANTED. (Barragan-Scott, Alana)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CENTRAL DIVISION
VERIZON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
COMMITTEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
THOMAS NICHOLS and TD
AMERITRADE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:14-CV-04053
ORDER
The parties have reached a stipulated resolution of Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 3]. By stipulation of the parties, it is hereby
ORDERED (a) that Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is deemed withdrawn;
and (b) the following Order is entered:
Until further order of the Court, Defendants Thomas Nichols and TD Ameritrade, and
Gradient Investments, LLC, the Registered Investment Adviser for Nichols’ IRA Account No.
XXXXX9149 held with TD Ameritrade (“Nichols IRA”), are hereby prohibited from dissipating,
transferring, pledging, spending, disposing of, or encumbering the balance remaining from the
$269,549.89 payment made from the GTE Midwest Incorporated Plan for Hourly-Paid
Employees’ Pensions (hereinafter, the “Pension Plan”), which is a component of the Verizon
Pension Plan for Mid-Atlantic and South Associates, to Thomas Nichols and rolled over to the
Nichols IRA, but which the parties acknowledge Defendant Thomas Nichols previously
withdrew approximately $30,000 from commingled assets making up the Nichols IRA prior to
notice and institution of this proceeding, as that amount has or will change based on earnings or
losses since January 1, 2014 (hereinafter the “Erroneous Pension Payment”). The provisions of
the immediately preceding sentence notwithstanding, as directed by the Court or as agreed to by
the parties, Defendants shall be permitted to transfer the entire principal amount of the Erroneous
Pension Payment, plus any associated earnings on the Erroneous Pension Payment, in a single
transfer into a separate, segregated deposit account, money market account, certificate of deposit
or equivalent liquid account maintained by TD Ameritrade, and if the Erroneous Pension
Payment, plus any associated earnings on the Erroneous Pension Payment, is so separated and
segregated, such amount shall be subject to this Order but no other funds, deposits, investments
or property of the Defendants shall be subject to this Order. Further, Defendant Thomas Nichols
shall be prohibited from dissipating, transferring, pledging, spending, disposing of, or
encumbering any cash or assets purchased with any funds previously withdrawn from the
Nichols IRA (the “Purchased Assets”). This Preliminary Injunction shall apply to Defendants
Thomas Nichols, Gradient Investments, LLC, and TD Ameritrade and their officers, agents,
servants and employees.
This Preliminary Injunction is entered solely for the purpose of preserving the balance of
the Nichols IRA attributable to the Erroneous Pension Payment until the Court vacates this Order
or the Action is resolved. This Order, the associated pleadings and evidence, the fact of the
Preliminary Injunction, and the Defendants' conduct in stipulating to the Preliminary Injunction
shall not be admissible in evidence or otherwise considered by the Court in determining
Defendants' liability or the remedies to which Plaintiff is entitled. Otherwise, the Court enters
this Order without prejudice to, or any effect on, Defendants' rights ultimately to contest liability
or the remedies sought by Plaintiff.
In accordance with the foregoing, the Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
is deemed withdrawn and the Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 3] is GRANTED.
s/ Nanette K. Laughrey
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY
United States District Judge
Dated: April 21, 2014
Jefferson City, Missouri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?