Looten et al v. United States of America
Filing
26
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. The parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Wrongful Death Settlement and Apportionment of Damages [Doc. 24 ] is granted. Defendant United States shall pay Plaintiff Stephanie Looten the settlement sum of $50,000.00. Stephanie Looten shall then distribute this settlement fund as follows: $14,485.01 to Plaintiffs' counsel and $17,757.49 to Plaintiff Jon Looten. Upon making these payments, Stephanie Looten shall file written receipts with the Court demonstrating compliance with this order. (Rosenbaum, Daniel)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CENTRAL DIVISION
STEPHANIE LOOTEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-cv-04121-NKL
ORDER
Pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095, the parties have asked the Court to approve their
settlement agreement in this wrongful death suit [Doc. 24]. For the following reasons, the
settlement is approved.
I.
Background
Plaintiffs Stephanie and Jon Looten, the surviving parents of Jasmine Looten, brought
this suit pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.080 and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28
U.S.C. § 1346, et seq, alleging wrongful death stemming from Jasmine Looten’s stillbirth
delivery.
In their Complaint, the Plaintiffs alleged that Jasmine Looten was delivered stillborn on
January 14, 2011 due to negligent pre-natal care provided by Dr. Lorraine Dodson, M.D. and Dr.
Brandi Nichols, M.D., both employees of the Community Health Center of Central Missouri, a
federally-supported medical facility. Dr. Dodson and Dr. Nichols were thus employees of
1
Defendant United States of America at the time of Jasmine’s death.
See 42 U.S.C. §
233(g)(1)(A).
Thereafter, the parties agreed to settle the case. This motion for approval of the wrongful
death settlement followed.
II.
Discussion
The parties ask the Court to approve a final settlement of $50,000.00 to be paid by the
United States. Of that total, $12,500.00, or 25%, will be distributed to Hanrahan & Nacy, P.C. as
attorneys’ fees.
The Plaintiffs have agreed to equally share the remaining $37,500.00 in
settlement proceeds, of which they will pay Hanrahan & Nacy $1,985.01 in litigation expenses.
As such, the parties ask the Court to approve their settlement and distribute the settlement
funds as follows: $17.757.50 to Stephanie Looten, $17.757.49 to Jon Looten, and $14,485.01 to
Hanrahan & Nacy in attorneys’ fees and expenses.
Pursuant to Missouri’s wrongful death statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.080, the Court must
resolve four questions before granting judgment: whether (1) the Plaintiffs attempted to notify all
parties having a cause of action arising from Jasmine Looten’s death, (2) the proposed settlement
is properly apportioned, (3) the attorneys’ fees provided in the proposed settlement are proper,
and (4) the parties’ proposal for distributing the settlement proceeds complies with the statutory
requirement.
A. Notice
As a prerequisite to approval, any settlement under the Missouri wrongful death statute
must demonstrate “a diligent attempt to provide notice to all parties having a cause of action.”
Snead by Snead v. Cordes by Golding, 811 S.W.2d 391, 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991) (citing Mo.
2
Rev. Stat. § 537.095.1). A party has a cause of action if he is “the spouse or children or the
surviving lineal descendants of any deceased children, natural or adopted, legitimate or
illegitimate, or by the father or mother of the deceased, natural or adoptive.” Mo. Rev. Stat. §
537.080.1(1).
The Plaintiffs have submitted affidavits stating that they are the natural parents of
Jasmine Looten, that “Jasmine Looten did not have any children that preceded her in death or
who have died between January 14, 2011 and today’s date,” and that, therefore, “the [P]laintiffs
are the sole members of the class of persons entitled to recover damages pursuant to Mo. Rev.
Stat. § 537.080.” [Doc. 24-1, p. 1, Doc. 24-2, p. 1].
Having reviewed these affidavits, the Court concludes that no other parties have a cause
of action arising out of Jasmine Looten’s death. Therefore, the Plaintiffs have satisfied the
statutory notice requirement.
B. Apportionment
In a wrongful death action, the trial court has discretion in apportioning settlement
proceeds. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095.3. See also Keene v. Wilson Refuse, Inc., 788 S.W.2d 324,
326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990) (“The legislature chose to place the duty and responsibility of
apportionment of losses in a wrongful death case squarely within the determination of the trial
court.”).
The Plaintiffs have agreed to split evenly the settlement proceeds, and the Court sees no
reason to disturb that arrangement.
C. Attorneys’ Fees
Section 537.095.4(2) provides that a court “shall order the claimant . . . [t]o deduct and
pay the expenses of recovery and collection of the judgment and the attorneys’ fees as
3
contracted.”
Missouri courts read this language to foreclose any judicial discretion when
awarding attorneys’ fees: if plaintiffs and counsel have signed a fee agreement, a court cannot
modify this contract when approving the wrongful death settlement. Keene, 788 S.W.2d at 327
(“[T]he clear language of the statute does not authorize an award of attorney’s fees as the court
deems fair and equitable.”) (internal quotations omitted). As such, when considering a request
for attorneys’ fees in this situation, a court is tasked only to establish that such a contract exists,
and if one does, the court must order payment per its terms. Haynes v. Bohon, 878 S.W.2d 902,
905 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
The parties carry the burden of providing evidence of a fee arrangement contract. Id. In
support of the Plaintiffs’ contingency fee agreement with Hanrahan & Nacy, the parties have
submitted a copy of their agreement. [Doc. 25]. The agreement states that “[counsel’s] fee will
be twenty (20) percent of the gross recovery if had at the administrative-claim level, and twentyfive (25) percent of the gross recovery if had thereafter in court.” Id. at 3.
The Court has reviewed these terms and determines that, consistent with the parties’
settlement request, Plaintiffs’ counsel is entitled 25% of the settlement figure. The Court further
determines that a payment of $1,985.01 in litigation expenses is appropriate.
D. Distribution
By the terms of Section 537.095, a court, in approving a wrongful death settlement, must
order the claimant as follows: “(1) To collect and receipt for the payment of the judgment; (2) To
deduct and pay the expenses of recovery and collection of the judgment and the attorneys’ fees
as contracted . . . (3) To acknowledge satisfaction in whole or in part for the judgment and costs;
(4) To distribute the net proceeds as ordered by the court; and (5) To report and account therefor
4
to the court.” This process must be strictly followed. Parr v. Parr, 16 S.W.3d 332, 338-39 (Mo.
banc 2000) (modifying the trial court’s judgment to conform with Section 537.095’s procedures).
The Court will accordingly follow Section 537.095’s framework in ordering distribution
of the parties’ settlement. For the purpose of this proceeding, Stephanie Looten shall serve as the
claimant. Stephanie Looten shall collect the $50,000.00 settlement from the United States.
From these proceeds, Stephanie Looten shall distribute $12,500.00 (attorneys’ fees) and
$1,985.01 (expenses) to Plaintiffs’ counsel, pursuant to the contingency fee agreement signed by
the Plaintiffs and their counsel, and acknowledge satisfaction for the judgment and costs.
From the remaining proceeds, Stephanie Looten shall distribute $17,757.49 to Jon
Looten.
III.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the parties’ wrongful death settlement is approved. Defendant
United States shall pay Plaintiff Stephanie Looten the settlement sum of $50,000.00. Stephanie
Looten shall then distribute this settlement fund as follows: $14,485.01 to Plaintiffs’ counsel and
$17,757.49 to Plaintiff Jon Looten. Upon making these payments, Stephanie Looten shall file
written receipts with the Court demonstrating compliance with this order.
s/ Nanette K. Laughrey
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY
United States District Judge
Dated: January 27, 2016
Jefferson City, Missouri
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?