Houston v. County of Boone et al
ORDER By Judge Nanette K. Laughrey ADOPTING the report and recommendation dated August 23, 2019, (Doc. 213 ), and GRANTING Defendant's Amended Motion for Order from Final Judgment, Order, or Proceedings, and Motion for Injunction, (Doc. 204 ). Signed on 10/7/2019 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Order mailed to Plaintiff.) (Finkelstein, Netanel)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
COUNTY OF BOONE, et al.,
On August 23, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. recommended
[Doc. 213] that the Defendant’s Second Amended Motion for Relief from Final Judgment,
Order, or Proceedings, and Motion for Injunction [Doc. 204] be granted. The parties were
advised they could file written objections to the recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(C). No objections were filed.
A de novo review of the record and applicable law convinces the Court that the
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and should be adopted.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of August
23, 2019 [Doc. 213] is adopted, and the Defendant’s Second Amended Motion for Relief from
Final Judgment, Order, or Proceedings, and Motion for Injunction [Doc. 204] is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk’s Order of Dismissal [Doc. 63] is
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the settlement agreement is set aside.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must return to the Defendant the
$1,276,048.51 received in settlement funds, and to not otherwise dispose of such funds.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all reasonable costs and expenses, including
reasonable legal fees, that were expended by Defendant to pursue this motion, should be
paid by Plaintiff to Defendant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice.
/s/Nanette K. Laughrey
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY
United States District Judge
Dated: October 7, 2019
Jefferson City, Missouri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?