U.S. Bank National Association v. Roller

Filing 36

JUDGMENT in favor of U.S. Bank National Association against Richard Eugene Roller. Signed on 12/27/11 by Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer. (Alexander, Pam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD EUGENE ROLLER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-3468-CV-S- JTM ) ) ) ) ORDER On December 19, 2011, this Court granted Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association's Motion for Summary Judgment and ordered Plaintiff to submit a proposed order calculating and setting forth the amount owed by Defendant under the personal guaranties including credits for any and all monies received on the Indebtedness (including through a bankruptcy plan) through December 19, 2011. After a careful review of materials submitted, the Court finds that U.S. Bank National Association is entitled to damages consisting of obligations due under the Note and Guaranties, attorney fees and costs. Through December 19, 2011, there remains due and owing on the Note as follows: principal in the sum of $1,380,877.87 (which includes credits for all monies received through December 19, 2011); accrued interest in the amount of $169,591.90; late fees in the amount of $10,368.83; accruing interest at the contractual rate, and attorneys' fees and costs incurred through November 30, 2011 in the amount of $62,332.64, for a total amount of $1,623,171.24 (the "Indebtedness"). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association and against Defendant Richard E. Roller in the amount of $1,623,171.24, plus postjudgment interest at the contractual rate. To the extent that Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association receives any additional payment on the Indebtedness, such payments shall reduce any amount owed on the Judgment. /s/ John T. Maughmer JOHN T. MAUGHMER U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?