Wright et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 157

ORDER granting 151 motion for summary judgment; granting 153 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 07/28/15 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Copy of this Order mailed to Theodore E. Wright, III and Sherry K. O'Neal-Wright, 2550 E. 11th, Joplin, MO 64801 (Amos, Gloria)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION THEODORE E. WRIGHT, III, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:12-cv-05120-SRB ORDER On June 15, 2015, Defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and S&W Foreclosure Corp. filed their Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. #151 and 153). Plaintiffs’ responses were due on July 9, 2015, but Plaintiffs failed to file their responses in accordance with Local Rule 56.1(b). On July 15, 2015, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiffs to show cause why the Motions for Summary Judgment should not be granted. Under the Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff had until July 24, 2015, to respond to the Order and file their responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment. As of this date, Plaintiffs have failed to comply with the Court’s Order. Accordingly, upon consideration and review of Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant S&W Foreclosure Corp.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and for Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with orders of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #151) is GRANTED; and ORDERED that Defendant S&W Foreclosure Corp.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, IV, and V of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Doc. # 153) is GRANTED. /s/Stephen R. Bough STEPHEN R. BOUGH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE: July 28, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?