Russel v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

Filing 48

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 motion for reconsideration. ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider Order of July 13, 2011 Granting in Part and Denying in Part, Plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider Motion for Extension of Time to File Suggestions in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #47) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff shall file her suggestions in opposition no later than 5:00 p.m. today, July 18, 2011. Signed on 07/18/2011 by District Judge Scott O. Wright. (Dwerlkotte, D.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION KEVA RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 09-0564-CV-W-SOW ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order of July 13, 2011 Granting in Part and Denying in Part, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Motion for Extension of Time to File Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #47). Plaintiff again moves the Court to reconsider its Order of July 13, 2011 giving plaintiff an extension of time until 12:00 p.m. on July 15, 2011 to file her suggestions in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s counsel informs the Court that she has suffered another asthma attack on July 12, 2011, and further, that on July 13, 2011, she discovered mold in her office building. Even though plaintiff’s counsel contends it was impossible to complete and submit plaintiff’s brief, plaintiff’s counsel was able to attend court hearings and file motions for continuances in other cases, as well as repeated motions for extensions of time in this case. The Court will give plaintiff until 5:00 p.m today, July 18, 2011, to file her suggestions in opposition. Should plaintiff fail to file her suggestions in opposition, the Court will rule on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on its own. Should plaintiff’s counsel file another motion for extension of time, it will be summarily denied. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order of July 13, 2011 Granting in Part and Denying in Part, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Motion for Extension of Time to File Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #47) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff shall file her suggestions in opposition no later than 5:00 p.m. today, July 18, 2011. /s/ Scott O. Wright SCOTT O. WRIGHT Senior United States District Judge DATED: July 18, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?