Gilmor v. Preferred Credit Corporation et al

Filing 483

ORDERED directing the parties to submit a jointly proposed summary of the notice that will be sent to the class members along with the Class Mail Notice. The Summary should employ plain English as much as possible, be devoid of legal terms and jargon , and identify (1) the recipients options, (2)the expected benefits, and (3) a means for obtaining additional information.Once these tasks have been completed, the Court will enter an order regardingthe motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. Signed on 4/4/2012 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Baldwin, Joella)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION MICHAEL P. and SHELLIE GILMOR, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. PREFERRED CREDIT CORP., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-0189-CV-W-ODS ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO (1) COMPLY WITH 28 U.S.C. § 1715 AND (2) SUBMIT A PROPOSED SUMMARY NOTICE 1. Pending is a motion seeking preliminary approval of a partial settlement on behalf of a class. The parties indicate they do not believe the notice provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1715 apply and they therefore do not perceive a need to comply with them. The Court does not agree with the parties’ assessment. Section 1715 applies to class actions, and as that term is defined (in section 1711(2)), it does not matter whether jurisdiction is based on the Class Action Fairness Act or not. While sections 1711-15 were passed by Congress as part of CAFA, they address Congress’ general concerns about all class action settlements, and their applicability is not dependant on CAFA’s jurisdictional provisions. This is significant for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that the Court cannot give final approval “earlier than 90 days after the later of the dates on which the appropriate Federal official and the appropriate State official are served with the notice required,” 28 U.S.C. § 1715(d), making it difficult to determine an appropriate time to have the final approval hearing. The parties are directed to comply with the notice provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1715(d) and file a certification when they have done so. 2. The Court has reviewed the Notice (also referred to as “the Class Mail Notice”) the parties propose sending class members. The Court directs the parties to submit a jointly proposed summary of the notice that will be sent to the class members along with the Class Mail Notice. The Summary should employ “plain English” as much as possible, be devoid of legal terms and jargon, and identify (1) the recipient’s options, (2) the expected benefits, and (3) a means for obtaining additional information. Once these tasks have been completed, the Court will enter an order regarding the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Ortrie D. Smith ORTRIE D. SMITH, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE: April 4, 2012 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?