Warren v. St. Joseph Medical Center

Filing 13

ORDERED denying as moot 9 plaintiff's motion to strike. Signed on 9/15/2011 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Baldwin, Joella)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT D. WARREN, Plaintiff, v. ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant. ) ) ) No. 11-0729-CV-W-FJG ) ) ) ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses of Defendant’s Answer with Suggestions in Support Thereof (Doc. No. 9). On September 6, 2011, Defendant filed an amended answer (Doc. No. 10) and suggestions in opposition (Doc. No. 11), indicating that the motion to strike is moot given that plaintiff consents to the filing of an amended answer. On September 14, 2011, defendant filed a notice of plaintiff’s written consent to the filing of the first amended answer (Doc. No. 12). Defendant may amend its pleading with the opposing parties’ written consent according to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Accordingly, as plaintiff has consented in writing to the filing of the amended answer, plaintiff’s motion to strike (Doc. No. 9) will be DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/15/2011 Kansas City, Missouri. /s/ FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR. Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?