Gericke v. Truman Medical Center, Inc.
Filing
20
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/18/16 by Chief District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
WESTERN DIVISION
TERA GERICKE,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:16-cv00344-DGK
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
At the parties’ request, the Court enters the following protective order.
This action asserts claims under Missouri common law. Given the nature of this action,
the parties are likely to propound and may receive discovery requests, and solicit and receive
testimony, seeking the disclosure of confidential and proprietary information about: (1)
Defendant Truman Medical Center, Inc.’s current or former employees (personnel records,
compensation and pay information); (2) Personnel and operational policies, proprietary
documents, documents or information pertaining to customers and/or patients, costs or charges,
or other financial documents; (3) Personnel documents (other than Plaintiff’s) containing
information protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(“HIPAA”); and/or (4) documents containing medical information regarding the Plaintiff
protected by HIPAA.
Disclosure of such information may violate the privacy of third parties or employees who
have not authorized public disclosure of such information and/or may include disclosure of
proprietary information.
Accordingly, upon consideration of the parties’ jointly submitted
Stipulated Protective Order concerning the foregoing described categories of information and
documents, and it appearing to the Court that sufficient cause exists for the issuance of a
Protective Order, it is ORDERED:
1.
Any information (whether in the form of documents, interrogatory responses,
deposition testimony, or other form) produced or exchanged by any of the parties to this action,
or any of their attorneys, which a party believes in good faith is of a confidential nature,
specifically including but not limited to: (1) Defendant Truman Medical Center Inc.’s current or
former employees (personnel records, compensation and pay information); (2) Personnel and
operational policies, proprietary documents, documents or information pertaining to customers
and/or patients, costs or charges, or other financial documents; (3) Personnel documents (other
than Plaintiff’s) containing information protected under the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”); and/or (4) documents containing medical information
regarding the Plaintiff protected by HIPAA (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Confidential
Information”) shall be treated as confidential and shall not be disclosed excepted as provided in
this Order; PROVIDED, however, that counsel for the party designating any information as
confidential may, in writing and without Court approval, agree to release any of the Confidential
Information from the requirements of this Order.
2.
A party may designate documents as Confidential Information by marking each
page of such material with the legend "Confidential" as appropriate, or the party may designate
information as confidential and subject to this Protective Order by stating in response to a
discovery request that the information contained in the written discovery response is confidential
and subject to this Protective Order. The “Confidential” designation on documents will be
placed where it does not deface, obscure, or cause the document to be difficult to read or
understand. Wherever it appears that Confidential Information may be revealed in a deposition
2
taken after the date of this Order, a party may provisionally designate the material on the record
at the time of its disclosure as “Confidential” and may move the Court to have the particular
portion of the record covered by the Order and filed under seal; PROVIDED, however, that such
a provisional designation will under no circumstances serve as a privilege or justification for
limiting the topics and scope of the deposition, ending the deposition, delaying the deposition, or
inhibiting counsel’s questioning of the deponent.
The parties will follow the Court’s
administrative procedures for electronically filing sealed documents in civil cases. Alternatively,
with respect to Confidential Information in deposition testimony, any party may designate
portions of the testimony as “Confidential” by notifying all counsel in writing of the page(s) and
line(s) of such testimony within thirty (30) days of receipt of a copy of a transcript, or such other
time period as mutually agreed upon by the parties.
3.
Confidential Information produced by or obtained from any other party in the
course of this action, through discovery or otherwise, shall be used by the party to whom such
information is produced solely for the purpose of this litigation and for no other purpose, and it
shall not otherwise be disclosed to anyone or used otherwise except as expressly provided in
paragraphs 4 and 5 below. Confidential Information may be used, consistently with the terms of
this Order and subject only to the limitations stated in this Order, in pretrial discovery and at the
trial or preparation for trial and any appeals of this action.
4.
Neither the Confidential Information nor its contents shall be disclosed to any
person without the agreement of the party designating the information as confidential,
PROVIDED that counsel may, without further agreement or Court order, disclose Confidential
Information or its contents to the following persons for use solely in connection with this action:
3
a.
The named parties to this action, all of whom have agreed to be bound and
are bound by the terms of this Order, including the corporate representatives of Truman
Medical Center, Inc. (including any of its respective former and/or current officers,
directors, employees, or agents);
b.
Attorneys and legal assistants of counsel’s firm and to any other
employees of counsel’s firm who shall handle the Confidential Information under normal
office procedures;
c.
Experts or consultants retained by the parties in this action;
d.
Any person who is an officer, director or employee of any reproduction or
litigation document handling service whom counsel specifically authorizes to work on
this case;
e.
Any person from whom testimony is being taken, has been taken or is
reasonably expected to be taken in this action (whether in deposition or at trial), at a
reasonable time before such testimony or during such testimony;
f.
The Court and its personnel before which this action is pending and any
members of a jury;
g.
Any court reporters and/or videographers present in their official capacity
at any hearing, deposition or other proceeding in this action;
h.
Persons specially retained by a party or counsel in this litigation to assist
in the preparation of this litigation for trial who are not regular employees of a party to
this litigation, and only if such persons are believed to need such Confidential
Information; and
4
i.
Any mediator or third-party neutral appointed by the Court or agreed to by
the parties.
5.
Each person referred to in subparagraphs 4c and 4h who has been shown or given
access to Confidential Information, or information derived therefrom, shall sign an
acknowledgement stating that he or she has read a copy of this Order and agrees to be bound by
its provisions, which acknowledgment shall be retained by counsel for the receiving party who
provides such material or information to such person. A copy of the acknowledgment will be
delivered to the opposing counsel, upon request, after the parties have designated experts.
6.
Subject to paragraph 10 of this Protective Order, all materials designated as
Confidential Information that are filed with the Court, and any pleading, motion or other papers
filed with the Court containing or disclosing such Confidential Information, shall be filed and
kept under seal until further order of the Court; provided, however, that such information shall be
available to the Court and other persons to whom Confidential Information may be disclosed in
accordance with paragraph 4 of this Protective Order.
7.
If a party inadvertently produces any Confidential Information without
designating it as such in accordance with the provisions of this Order, the producing party may
give written notice to the receiving party that the information produced is deemed Confidential
Information and should be treated as such in accordance with the provisions of this Order. The
receiving party must treat such information as Confidential Information from the date such
notice is received.
Disclosure, prior to the receipt of such notice, of such Confidential
Information to persons not authorized to receive such Confidential Information shall not be
deemed a violation of this Order; provided, however, that the party making such disclosure shall
make all reasonable efforts to notify any party to whom such disclosure was made that such
5
information is Confidential pursuant to this Order. The parties shall attempt in good faith to
retrieve any inadvertently produced Confidential Information from anyone not listed in
paragraph 4 of this Protective Order.
8.
The parties acknowledge the applicability of Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of
Evidence to this action. FED. R. EVID. 502. The parties further agree that documents containing
privileged information, work product, and/or trial-preparation material shall be immediately
returned if the documents appear on their face to have been inadvertently produced. Other
produced materials which the producing party claims are privileged or protected as work product
and/or trial-preparation materials shall be returned by the opposing party immediately upon the
producing party’s written request. If there is a disagreement regarding the privilege or protection,
the produced materials which the producing party claims are privileged or protected as work
product and/or trial-preparation materials shall be segregated and maintained confidentially by
the receiving party until the Court rules on the producing party’s claim regarding the privilege or
protection.
To the extent that information contained in a document subject to a claim of
privilege or protection has already been used or described in other documents generated or
maintained by the receiving party, then the receiving party will sequester such documents until
the claim has been resolved. If the receiving party disclosed the specified information before
being notified of its inadvertent production, it must take reasonable steps to retrieve it.
9.
Except for this action, the parties agree that if a party is required by law or order
of governmental or judicial body to release Confidential Information produced by another party
or third party as to which it obtained access pursuant to the provisions of this Protective Order,
the party so required shall notify the producing party or third party in writing within three (3)
working days or receipt of actual notice or within three (3) working days of the determination
6
that the Confidential Information is to be released or within three (3) working days prior to such
release, whichever is soonest, to permit the producing party or third party to contest the release.
10.
This Order has no effect upon, and its scope shall not extend to, any party’s use of
its own Confidential Information.
11.
Except as otherwise stated herein, this Order will in no way prevent the usage of
Confidential Information at trial including, but not limited to, the use of such documents in the
examination of a witness, displaying or publishing to the jury, and enlarging as demonstrative
evidence.
12.
Producing or receiving materials or otherwise complying with the terms of this
Order shall not (a) operate as an admission by any party that any particular discovery material
contains or reflects any Confidential Information or a trade secret under applicable law; or (b)
prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the production of documents it considers
not subject to discovery or otherwise protected from or limited in discovery on the basis of
privilege or otherwise; or (c) prejudice in any way the rights of a party to seek a Court
determination regarding whether particular discovery materials should be produced; or
(d) prejudice in any way the rights of a party to apply to the Court, in good faith, for additional
protection with respect to the confidentiality of information.
13.
The confidentiality provisions of this Order shall survive any settlement,
judgment or other disposition or conclusion of this action, and all appeals therefrom. After final
resolution of this action and within thirty (30) days following a written request by the
designating party, all Confidential Information and reproductions thereof shall be: either
(a) returned to counsel for the party who provided the information; or (b) destroyed, and counsel
7
for the party receiving the information shall sign a certification attesting to such destruction.
PROVIDED, this return or destruction rule shall not apply to Court personnel.
14.
Any party may at any time and for any reason seek modification of this Protective
Order. In the event either party disputes the appropriateness of the other’s designation of
documents or information as confidential pursuant to this Order, then the party shall first attempt
to resolve the issue with opposing counsel and then, if unsuccessful, may apply to the Court for
an order declaring specific documents or information to be removed from the Protective Order
and no longer treated as confidential. The party designating the information as confidential shall
bear the burden of proof on the issue.
15.
This Protective Order can be modified only by written agreement approved by the
Court or by Order of the Court. Each party reserves the right to object to any party’s motion or
request to modify this Protective Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
October 18, 2016
/s/ Greg Kays
GREG KAYS, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?