Lewis v. Blue Springs School District et al
Filing
61
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of the Confidential Wrongful Death Settlement Agreement, Doc. 60 , is granted. Signed on 3/1/2018 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Dickinson, Gregory)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
WESTERN DIVISION
REBECCA LEWIS, Individually, and as Ad
Litem on behalf of Decedent, and Decedent’s
wrongful death beneficiaries,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 4:17-cv-00538-NKL
v.
BLUE SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095, Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, and Defendant Blue
Springs School District have asked the Court to approve their Confidential Wrongful Death Settlement Agreement. For the following reasons, the settlement is approved.
I.
Background
Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, is the surviving mother of decedent, Ryker Lewis, who died at
age 15. Ryker did not have any children or a spouse. His father, Will Lewis, who was and still
is married to Plaintiff Rebecca Lewis, also survived decedent Ryker Lewis. Plaintiff, Rebecca
Lewis, filed suit under Missouri’s wrongful death statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.080, alleging
wrongful death, as well as other claims against Defendant Blue Springs School District, which
are set forth in the Petition. The suit stems from Ryker Lewis’ death, which occurred when he
completed the act of suicide on or about May 20, 2014.
dential Wrongful Death Settlement with respect to attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and apportionment between Plaintiff, and her husband.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095 provides that the trial court must approve any settlement in a
claim for damages under Missouri’s wrongful death statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.080. Specifically, “upon the approval of any settlement for which a petition or application for such approval
has been filed, the court shall state the total settlement approved. The court shall then enter a
judgment as to such damages, apportioning them among those persons entitled thereto in proportion to the losses suffered by each as determined by the court.” Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095.3. If
multiple parties have standing to sue under the wrongful death statute, any one or more of them
may compromise or settle the claim for damages with approval of any circuit court, . . . provided
that the claimant or petitioner shall satisfy the court that she has diligently attempted to notify all
parties having a cause of action under Section 537.080. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095.1.
In entering judgment, “[t]he court shall order the claimant: (1) to collect and receipt for
the payment of the judgment; (2) to deduct and pay the expenses of recovery and collection of
the judgment and the attorneys’ fees as contracted…(3) To acknowledge satisfaction in whole or
in part of the judgment and costs; (4) to distribute the net proceeds as ordered by the court; and
(5) To report and account therefor to the court.” Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095.4.
3
Therefore, before granting judgment, the Court must resolve four questions: whether (1)
the Plaintiff attempted to notify all parties having a cause of action arising from decedent Ryker
Lewis’s death, (2) the proposed settlement is properly apportioned, (3) the attorneys’ fees provided in the proposed settlement are proper, and (4) the parties’ proposal for distributing the settlement proceeds complies with the statutory requirement.
A.
Notice
As a prerequisite to approval, any settlement under the Missouri wrongful death statute
must demonstrate “a diligent attempt to provide notice to all parties having a cause of action.”
Snead by Snead v. Cordes by Golding, 811 S.W.2d 391, 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991). A party has a
cause of action if he is “the spouse or children or the surviving lineal descendants of any deceased children, natural or adopted, legitimate or illegitimate, or by the father or mother of the
deceased, natural or adoptive.” Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.080.1(1).
Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, and her husband Will Lewis have each signed an affidavit stating that their minor son had never been married, and had no children. Having reviewed these
affidavits, the Court concludes that no other parties have a cause of action arising out of Ryker
Lewis’ death. It follows, therefore, that the Plaintiff has satisfied the statutory notice requirement.
B.
Apportionment
In a wrongful death action, the trial court has discretion in apportioning settlement proceeds. Kavanaugh v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., 937 S.W.2d 243, 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996). See also
Keene v. Wilson Refuse, Inc., 788 S.W.2d 324, 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990) (“The legislature chose
to place the duty and responsibility of apportionment of losses in a wrongful death case squarely
within the determination of the trial court.”). After weighing the losses suffered by each party, a
4
court may reasonably exercise this discretion by awarding plaintiffs unequal portions from the
settlement fund. Kavanaugh, 788 S.W.2d at 246. Conversely, a court may also determine that
two parties merit the same award, in this case the Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, and her husband Will
Lewis, have agreed to split evenly the remainder of the settlement proceeds after attorney’s fees
and expenses are deducted. The Court finds no reason to disturb this arrangement between
Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, and her husband, Will Lewis.
C.
Attorneys’ Fees
Section 537.095.4(2) provides that a court “shall order the claimant…[t]o deduct and pay
the expenses of recovery and collection of the judgment and the attorneys’ fees as contracted.”
Missouri courts read this language to foreclose any judicial discretion when awarding attorneys’
fees: if plaintiff, and her husband, have signed a fee agreement, a court cannot modify this contract when approving the wrongful death settlement. Keene, 788 S.W.2d at 327. (“[T]he clear
language of the statute does not authorize an award of attorney’s fees as the court deems fair and
equitable.”) (internal citations omitted). As such, when considering a request for attorneys’ fees
in this situation, a court is tasked only to establish that such contract exists, and if one does, the
court must order payment per its terms. Haynes v. Bohon, 878 S.W.2d 902, 905 (Mo. Ct. App.
1994).
The parties carry the burden of providing evidence of a fee arrangement contract. Id. The
affidavits of Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, and her husband Will Lewis, indicate that they did enter
into a written agreement wherein Plaintiff would pay attorneys’ fees
Furthermore, the parties provided said contract under seal. The affidavits of Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, and her husband Will Lewis, as well as the attorney fee agree-
5
ment states that litigation costs would be advanced by their attorneys and Plaintiff and her husband understood and agreed to reimburse costs advanced on their behalf.
The Court has reviewed these terms and determines that, consistent with the parties’ settlement request, Plaintiff’s counsel is entitled
The Court further determines that a payment to Plaintiff’s counsel
in
litigation costs and expenses advanced on their behalf is also appropriate.
Furthermore, the Court notes that even if the Court were required to independently ensure
that the application of this attorney’s fee contract was fair as applied to this case the Court finds
that such fee is fair under the Rules of ethics.
. Therefore the Court finds that
the attorneys’ fee sought
in this case is fair and rea-
sonable under the facts and circumstances of the case.
D.
Distribution
By the terms of Section 537.095, a court, in approving a wrongful death settlement, must
order the claimant to collect the judgment, deduct expenses and attorneys’ fees, distribute the
proceeds, and report to the court that these steps have been accomplished. See Mo. Rev. Stat. §
537.095.4. The Missouri Supreme Court has made clear that this process must be strictly followed. Parr v. Parr, 16 S.W.3d 332, 338-39 (Mo. banc 2000). The Court will accordingly follow Parr’s framework in ordering distribution of the parties’ agreed-upon Confidential Wrongful
6
Death Settlement. For purposes of this proceeding, Rebecca Lewis, Ryker Lewis’ mother, shall
serve as the claimant.
Rebecca Lewis shall collect the
settlement from the Defendants, and may
be permitted to do so in the manner set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Release which indicates Rebecca Lewis is collecting the settlement by and through Sullivan Law, LLC from the
Defendants. From these proceeds, Plaintiff Rebecca Lewis shall direct Sullivan Law, LLC to
distribute, and it is further Ordered that Sullivan Law, LLC shall distribute the settlement proceeds in the manner set forth above, which in summary is as follows:
Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis shall acknowledge full settlement of claims against all Defendants in this case, and her as well as her husband shall execute the Confidential Settlement
Agreement/Release of Claims filed under seal with the Court. After distribution, Plaintiff, Rebecca Lewis, is directed to file a report with this Court concerning the receipt and distribution of
the settlement funds pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095.4.
Finally, the Court finds that one of the terms in the proposed Confidential Wrongful
Death Settlement Agreement/Release is a provision concerning confidentiality as to the terms of
7
settlement, and the amount. Due to the nature of this case, and the manner in which the death of
a minor occurred in this case, the Court finds it reasonable to approve the confidentiality provision as set forth in the Settlement Agreement/Release.
III.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the Parties’ Joint Application for Approval of the Confidential
Wrongful Death Settlement is granted, and the unredacted version of this Order along with the
documents already submitted under seal shall remain under seal and confidential.
s/ Nanette K. Laughrey
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY
United States District Judge
Dated: March 1, 2018
Jefferson City, Missouri
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?