Taber et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 14

ORDER DENYING APPEAL FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER. Signed on 10/18/2017 by Chief District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION STEVEN W. TABER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 17-09005-MC-W-SWH ORDER DENYING APPEAL FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER Now before the Court is Non-Party Autoliv ASP, Inc’s Objections to and Appeal (Doc. 10) from Magistrate Judge Hays’s Order (Doc. 9), which denied in part and granted in part Autoliv’s Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoena (Doc. 1). On or about October 21, 2017, Autoliv was served a subpoena duces tecum seeking the production of documents and deposition testimony for use in the above-captioned case. Autoliv claims that the subpoena is overly broad and unduly burdensome. After conducting an independent review of the applicable law and record, see L.R. 74.1(a)(3), the Court ADOPTS Judge Hays’s Order. Autoliv’s appeal raises the same arguments that were presented to Judge Hays and does not show that the Order is “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Accordingly, Autoliv’s Objections to and Appeal from Judge Hays’s Order (Doc. 10) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Greg Kays GREG KAYS, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?