Federal Trade Commission et al v. Next-Gen, Inc. et al
Filing
322
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 254 motion to approve Temporary Receiver's Second Application for fees and expenses and to approve an increase in billing rates. Signed on September 30, 2019, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
WESTERN DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NEXT-GEN, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:18-CV-00128-DGK
ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR FEES AND
EXPENSES FROM SEPTEMBER 1, 2018, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2018, AND
DENYING A REQUESTED RATE INCREASE
Now before the Court is the Temporary Receiver’s Second Application for Allowance of
Compensation for Services Rendered and Reimbursement of Actual and Necessary Expenses for
the Period September 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018, and Request to Increase Billing Rates
for 2019 (Doc. 254) as amended by the Corrective Supplement (Doc. 258) (collectively, the
“Amended Motion”). The Amended Motion requests: (1) authorization to pay professional fees
(Temporary Receiver, legal, accounting, computer services, etc.) of $489.748.99 and
reimbursement expenses of $14,562.25; (2) authorization for the Temporary Receiver to transfer
funds to the Temporary Receiver’s disbursement account in which to cover approved receiver and
professional fees; and (3) authorization for a proposed rate increase. No party has filed any
objection or other response to the motion.
After carefully considering the request, the Amended Motion is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART.
On July 17, 2018, this Court entered a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) (Doc. 98).
Among other things, the TRO appointed Eric Johnson as Temporary Receiver of the Receivership
Entities1 in this case. Id. at 14. The TRO provided that the “Receiver and all personnel hired by
the Receiver . . . are entitled to reasonable compensation for the performance of duties pursuant to
this Order and for the cost of actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them, from the Assets now
held by, in the possession or control of, or which may be received by, the Receivership Entities.”
Id. at 24.
On November 6, 2018, the Court granted the Temporary Receiver’s First Application for
Allowance of Compensation for Services Rendered and Reimbursement of Actual and Necessary
Expenses for the Period July 17, 2018 through August 31, 2018. This application was for services
furnished by the Temporary Receiver and his retained professionals incurred in performing tasks
required by the TRO. The Court approved payment of the following amounts from receivership
assets: (1) $58,616.00 in fees to the Temporary Receiver; (2) $180,648.50 in fees, plus $10,243.31
in expenses, to the Temporary Receiver’s attorneys Spencer Fane LLP (“Spencer Fane”); (3)
$20,790.00 in fees, plus $9,350.00 in expenses, to UnitedLex Corporation (“UnitedLex”) for
computer services; and (4) $1,961.28 in fees to RubinBrown LLP (“RubinBrown”). Order at 3
(Doc. 226). The total amount approved was $222,993.09.
The Temporary Receiver now moves for an award of professional fees and expenses
incurred from September 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. The amended motion seeks: (1)
$142,077.25 in fees for the Temporary Receiver; (2) $233,633.20 in fees, plus $10,862.25 in
expenses, for Spencer Fane; (3) $88,736.99 in fees to RubinBrown; (4) $21,480.00 in fees, plus
$3,700.00 in expenses, for UnitedLex; and (5) $3,821.55 in fees and expenses for Rox’s Images.
The total amount of fees and expenses requested is $504,311.24.
1
The TRO defines a Receivership Entity as any corporate Defendant, and “any other entity that has conducted any
business related to the Defendants’ distribution of deceptive sweepstakes or other prize mailers, including receipt of
Assets derived from any activity that is the subject of the Complaint in this matter, and that the Receiver determines
is controlled or owned by any Defendant.” TRO at 4-5.
2
The requests covers a wide variety of services and costs incurred by the Temporary
Receiver and his retained professionals on behalf of the Receivership Entities, including, but not
limited to: maintaining a chain of custody for the estate property, securing the Receivership
Entities’ primary business premises, managing the Receivership Entities’ assets, conducting a
privilege review of documents at a facility, ensuring compliance with the asset freeze, researching
and properly terminating all of the various Employee Benefit Plans and 401(k) plans, and
consulting with the parties and the Court.
After reviewing the record, the Court finds this portion of the motion should be granted.
First, the total amount of fees and expenses requested is reasonable given the complex nature of
this case, the numerous tasks performed by the Temporary Receiver, and the complexity of these
tasks. Second, the requested hourly rates are not unreasonable. Third, the fact that no opposition
or other response has been filed supports a finding that the amount of fees and expenses are
reasonable.
The portion of the motion seeking pre-approval to increase the rates charged by Spencer
Fane, however, will not be approved. The rates the Court will pay for legal services are those it
previously approved as fair and reasonable, that is, the 2018 rates.
Accordingly, the Amended Motion is GRANTED IN PART. It is ORDERED that the
Temporary Receiver may pay the following amounts from receivership assets:
(1) $142,077.25 in fees for the Temporary Receiver;
(2) $233,633.20 in fees, plus $10,862.25 in expenses, for Spencer Fane;
(3) $88,736.99 in fees to RubinBrown;
(4) $21,480.00 in fees, plus $3,700.00 in expenses, for UnitedLex; and
(5) $3,821.55 in fees and expenses for Rox’s Images.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver is authorized to transfer funds
to the Temporary Receiver’s disbursement account in which to cover these payments.
The Temporary Receiver’s request to increase the rates paid to Spencer Fane is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: September 30, 2019
/s/ Greg Kays
GREG KAYS, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?