Joiner v. Allied Staffing
Filing
14
ORDER denying 9 motion for default judgment. Signed on 7/16/18 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Copy of this order mailed to: Janice Louise Joiner, 9720 East 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64133. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
WESTERN DIVISION
JANICE LOUISE JOINER,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALLIED STAFFING,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:18-cv-00363-SRB
ORDER
Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Janice Louise Joiner’s Motion to Enter a Judgment by
Default Against the Defendant. (Doc. #9). Plaintiff failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 55, and the motion is DENIED.
I.
Background
Plaintiff initiated this action on May 15, 2018, by filing a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis. The Court granted the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directed Plaintiff to
file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed the Amended Complaint on June 6, 2018, and on
June 7, 2018, the Court directed the U.S. Marshal to serve process on Defendant. The U.S.
Marshal filed a return of service evidencing service by mail (FedEx) on Defendant on June 20,
2018. On July 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed the present motion asking the Court to “enter[] a
judgment by default against the Defendant.” (Doc. #13, p. 1).
II.
Discussion
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), “When a party against whom a
judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure
is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter a party’s default.” Rule 55(b) provides
how default judgment may be obtained, but only after a clerk’s entry of default. See Johnson v.
Dayton Elec. Mfg. Co., 140 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1998) (“When a party ‘has failed to plead or
otherwise defend’ against a pleading listed in Rule 7(a), entry of default under Rule 55(a) must
precede grant of a default judgment under Rule 55(b).”).
Plaintiff did not move for a clerk’s entry of default under Rule 55(a). Plaintiff’s motion
for default judgment under Rule 55(b) is, therefore, procedurally improper. The Court also notes
that the time for Defendant to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint had not
expired by the time the instant motion was filed given that service was attempted by mail. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(A); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 506.150.4. Therefore, pro se Plaintiff Janice Louise
Joiner’s Motion to Enter a Judgment by Default Against the Defendant (Doc. #9) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Stephen R. Bough
STEPHEN R. BOUGH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 16, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?